Capturing Evidence and Rationales with Requirements Engineering and Argumentation-Based Techniques
نویسندگان
چکیده
User Requirements Notation (URN) is a modeling language with two complementary notations for capturing goals and non-functional requirements as well as low level processes and functional requirements. URN helps documenting the rationale behind the decisions, however, it lacks gathering the evidences for these rationales and documenting stakeholder discussions. In this paper, we propose a framework to extend URN with the Hybrid approach in reasoning based on evidences.
منابع مشابه
Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC
Having developed, used and evaluated some of the early IBIS-based approaches to design rationale (DR) such as gIBIS and QOC in the late 1980s/mid-1990s, we describe the subsequent evolution of the argumentation-based paradigm through software support, and perspectives drawn from modeling and meeting facilitation. Particular attention is given to the challenge of negotiating the overheads of cap...
متن کاملHypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale
Having developed, used and evaluated some of the early IBIS-based approaches to design rationale (DR) such as gIBIS and QOC in the late 1980s/mid-1990s, we describe the subsequent evolution of the argumentation-based paradigm through software support, and perspectives drawn from modeling and meeting facilitation. Particular attention is given to the challenge of negotiating the overheads of cap...
متن کاملRapid Argumentation Capture from Analysis Reports: The Case Study of Aum Shinrikyo
The availability of subject matter experts has always been a challenge for the development of knowledge-based cognitive assistants incorporating their expertise. This paper presents an approach to rapidly develop cognitive assistants for evidence-based reasoning by capturing and operationalizing the expertise that was already documented in analysis reports. It illustrates the approach with the ...
متن کاملEnhancing Goal-Based Requirements Consistency: An Argumentation-Based Approach
Requirements engineering research has for long recognized the leading role of goals as requirement artifacts during the requirements engineering specification processes. Given the large number of artifacts created during the requirements specification and the continuous evolution of these artifacts, reasoning about them remains a challenging task. Moreover, the rising complexity of the target d...
متن کاملThe Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ Linguistic and Logical Intelligences and the Frequency of Fallacies and Evidence in their Argumentative Writing: A Gender-based Study
The learners’ ability to write a well-organized argumentative essay has gained prominence within the last decades. The multiple intelligences play a significant role in enhancing the precision of both language and thought during the writing process. The current study aimed at investigating the possible relationship between linguistic and logical intelligences and the frequency of informal falla...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014